Cultural Change vs Political Change

Which comes first, changing the culture or changing the law and political institutions?

Many freedom initiatives tend to focus on the philosophical or ethical integrity of their messages in place of employing an effective strategy for widespread adoption. This makes it extremely difficult to foster incentives in society which deter people from aggressing. As such, they rarely effectively showcase a viable, and prosperous, alternative to the current systems of aggressing in society.

The Live and Let Live Movement addresses this gap through pursuing a cultural strategy built on three pillars: Awareness, Belonging, and Change.

These pillars operate through ground-up (cultural) initiatives which feed into top-down (political). Read the Live and Let Live white paper for further details on this strategy.

The movement rejects violent revolution in favor of a “thought revolution and peaceful change”, including a decentralized network of voluntary adopters gradually superseding the status quo of aggressive models for human interaction.